products and materials provided for research and educational use only

The batches we destroyed this quarter, and why.

Three lots failed third-party testing in Q1. None of them shipped. This is the public record of what failed — the same record we wish every seller in the category kept.

Three lots failed third-party testing in the first quarter of this year. None of them shipped. We destroyed all three, absorbed the cost, and re-synthesized. This is the public record of what failed and why — the same record we wish every seller in the category kept.

A failed batch is not an embarrassment to hide; it is the system working. The point of testing every lot is that some lots will fail. What separates a serious seller from a careless one is what happens next.

What failed, and how

Every lot is tested for three things: identity by mass spectrometry, purity by reverse-phase HPLC, and safety by endotoxin assay. A lot has to pass all three. In Q1 we lost one lot to each category — one identity failure, one purity failure, one safety failure.

The three lots

These are pulled directly from our lab records. Each links to the original report.

lotwhy it was destroyed

Why we publish failures

The cheap move is to quietly re-test, or to lower the bar until the lot passes, or to sell marginal product to a market that cannot check. We publish the failures for the same reason we publish the passes: a lab report you can only see when it's good is not a lab report, it's an advertisement. Every destroyed lot is listed on the lab reports page alongside the ones that passed.